Professor Lininger grew up in southern Oregon. He earned his undergraduate degree at Yale, and his law degree at Harvard. He has worked as a federal prosecutor, as counsel to a subcommittee in the U.S. Senate, and as a litigation attorney with the law firm Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher and Flom in San Francisco. Lininger joined the UO faculty in 2003.
One of Lininger’s research interests is the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment, particularly the application of the clause to prosecutions of domestic violence and sexual assault. Bonnie Campbell, the former director of the U.S. Violence Against Women Office, commended Lininger as a 'national leader in the prosecution of domestic violence.' He has authored legislation that addresses the unique challenges faced by complainants in prosecutions of domestic violence and rape. Senator Joseph Biden's staff invited Lininger to participate in a work group advising the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee on legislative strategies to meet the Supreme Court's new confrontation requirements for hearsay in criminal prosecutions. Lininger’s research on domestic violence and sexual assault has been cited by the U.S. Supreme Court, the New York Times, and the Washington Post.
Lininger’s latest research focuses on the intersection of environmental law, ethics and criminal procedure. As a former prosecutor of environmental crime and a plaintiff’s attorney who sued polluters, Lininger is interested in customizing ethical and procedural rules for the unique context of environmental advocacy. Lininger has served on the state board of directors for the Oregon Natural Resources Council. He has been an ethics advisor for the Sustainable Future Section of the Oregon Bar, and a member of the Ethics Committee for the American Bar Association’s Section on Environment, Energy and Resources. Lininger has recently presented his environmental scholarship at Yale, Stanford, Columbia, NYU, Texas, Vanderbilt, Washington, Utah and SMU, as well as at conferences sponsored by the National Science Foundation and the American Bar Association. In 2018, a panel of judges at Vanderbilt Law School and the Environmental Law Institute selected Lininger’s article “Green Ethics for Judges” as one of the top five articles among more than 300 environmental law articles published over the prior year.
Lininger’s scholarship has appeared in the Virginia Law Review, the Michigan Law Review, the Duke Law Journal, the Northwestern University Law Review, the Cornell Law Review, the Texas Law Review, the Minnesota Law Review, the George Washington Law Review, the Boston College Law Review, the Iowa Law Review, the Indiana Law Journal, the Fordham Law Review, the Tulane Law Review, the Hastings Law Journal, and the Stanford Law and Policy Review, among other journals.
The University of Oregon has given Lininger awards for teaching, scholarship and service. In 2006, Lininger received the Ersted Award for Distinguished Teaching. In 2008, he received the Lokey Award for Faculty Excellence. In 2010, he won the Hollis Teaching Award. In 2017, he received “Pillar of the Community”Award.
SELECTED WORKS BY TOM LININGER
(Last updated in February 2020)
I. WIGMORE TREATISE
THE NEW WIGMORE: VOLUME ON IMPEACHMENT AND REHABILITATION (with Roger Park) -- published by Aspen/Wolters in 2012; supplements published every year since 2013
- “[T]he principal modern treatise on evidence . . .”
-- U.S. Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan
- “Wigmore’s treatise was the dominant work of evidence scholarship in the 20th century. The new volume by Park and Lininger concerns the impeachment and rehabilitation of witnesses, one of the central, and most perplexing, areas of evidentiary law. The volume will certainly be widely used, as other volumes have been, by judges, practitioners, and academics . . . . Lininger is one of the outstanding scholars of evidence of the younger generation.”
-- Richard Friedman, University of Michigan Law School
- “The New Wigmore is a justly prestigious series, and I am sure that the volume by Park and Lininger will be influential and highly valuable -- particularly given the exceptional Expertise and strong professional reputation that each author brings to this project. This will be a significant contribution to evidence law scholarship, and the bench, bar, and academy owe the authors a debt of gratitude.”
-- David Sklansky, Stanford Law School
II. EXAMPLES OF SCHOLARSHIP IN LAW REVIEWS
No Privilege to Pollute: Expanding the Crime-Fraud Exception to the Attorney-Client Privilege, 105 MINNESOTA LAW REVIEW ___ (2020)
Green Ethics for Judges, 86 GEORGE WASHINGTON LAW REVIEW 711 (2018)
Green Ethics for Lawyers, 57 BOSTON COLLEGE LAW REVIEW 61 (2016)
Deregulating Public Interest Law, 88 TULANE LAW REVIEW 727 (2014)
Should Oregon Adopt the New Federal Rules of Evidence?, 89 OREGON LAW REVIEW 101 (2011)
The Sound of Silence: Holding Batterers Accountable for Silencing Their Victims, 87 TEXAS LAW REVIEW 857 (2009)
Is It Wrong to Sue for Rape?, 57 DUKE LAW JOURNAL 1557 (2008)
The Promise and Limitations of Forensic Linguistics, 92 CORNELL LAW REVIEW 833 (2007)
From Park Place to Community Chest: Rethinking Lawyers’ Monopoly, 101 NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW 1343 (2007)
On Dworkin and Borkin’, 105 MICHIGAN LAW REVIEW1315 (2007)
Kids Say the Darndest Things: The Prosecutorial Use of Hearsay Statements by Children, 82 INDIANA LAW JOURNAL 999 (2007)
Reconceptualizing Confrontation After Davis, 85 TEXAS LAW REVIEW 272 (2006)
Prosecuting Batterers After Crawford, 91 VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW 747 (2005)
Bearing the Cross, 74 FORDHAM LAW REVIEW 101 (2005)
Sects, Lies and Videotape: The Surveillance and Infiltration of Religious Groups, 89 IOWA LAW REVIEW 1201 (2004)